BBC News app

The BBC News app is available for Android and iOS devices

With the latest news and analysis from our journalists around the world and the unique human stories behind current events, we’ve got the best of our journalism in one place on the BBC News app.

Click here, external to download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Click here, external to download the BBC News app from Google Play for Android devices.

If you’re outside the UK, you can download the BBC app here, external.

News, features and analysis

Read top stories and breaking news

Watch live and developing news coverage

Get news and weather local to you

Follow news that’s important to you

Get alerts for top stories

We would like to know what you think of the new app – click here to give us your feedback.

Depending on the contract you have, data charges may apply for accessing the internet on your mobile device.

If you are not sure about the potential charges, please ask your mobile network provider. You may find some costs are included in your existing price plan or that you can opt for a data package that gives reduced charges for accessing the internet.

The BBC does not charge you to access mobile content.

Copyright © 2025 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Watchdog warns allergy sufferers about Dubai chocolate

The UK food watchdog has warned people with allergies not to buy imported Dubai chocolate if they have any doubts about ingredients because of different labelling standards.

The Food Standards Agency’s chief scientific advisor said shoppers should stick to “trusted” retailers in the UK as the products they sell are more likely to be made for the domestic market.

Dubai chocolate has become hugely popular fuelled by so-called “influencers” on TikTok, leading UK supermarkets such as Waitrose and Lidl to impose per person limits to meet demand.

But a recent investigation by the BBC found several TikTok Shop users selling food without listing allergen information.

UK businesses are legally required to declare if a product they sell contains one of the 14 regulated allergens – including nuts and milk.

The FSA found some imported Dubai-style chocolate products may not have been intended for sale in the UK and therefore lack a full ingredients list or allergen labelling that are legally required.

Professor Robin May, the FSA’s chief chief scientific advisor, said: “Some imported Dubai-style chocolate products don’t meet our standards and could be a food safety risk, especially for consumers with allergies.”

He added: “As it’s difficult for consumers to tell the difference between products made for the UK and those that aren’t, if you have a food allergy or intolerance, we advise that you do not buy the product unless you’re certain it’s intended for sale here.”

By law, products made to UK standards must have labels that have the ingredients written in English, the name of the food, a best before or use by date, and the name and address of a UK or European Union (EU) business that is responsible for information on the product.

If the food is not from the EU or UK then an importer must be listed.

The FSA said it had worked with local authorities to identify a number of Dubai chocolate products that posed a health risk to consumers with allergies.

It said some of these products may also contain additives and colours which aren’t allowed to be sold in the UK.

The popular treat combines the flavours of chocolate, pistachio and tahini with filo pastry, and is inspired by the Arab dessert Knafeh.

The regulator is now sampling products to work out the scale of the problem.

It said shoppers should report any concerns to their local authority and is working with allergy charities to raise awareness.

The portraits made out of several types of digestives are covered with varnish to protect them.

Scientists near Reading help protect the world’s cocoa supply from pests and diseases.

The bar was one of a batch sent by Queen Victoria to British troops fighting in the Boer War.

Mr D’Souza reviewed 21 eggs last year and was watched by more than 4.2 million people on TikTok.

Mondelēz International, which owns the brand, says it took the “difficult decision” to axe the 360g bar.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Spanish PM sorry for corruption scandal as opposition demands resignation

Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has apologised to the Spanish people after an escalating corruption scandal brought down a senior Socialist party colleague.

Sánchez, who has led Spain since 2018, said there was no such thing as “zero corruption” and he sought to put to distance himself from the affair, ruling out early elections.

Opposition conservative leader Alberto Núñez Feijóo said it was time for Sánchez to resign: “Survival is no longer an option.”

A downbeat Sánchez admitted he had been wrong to trust Santos Cerdán, the secretary of his Socialist party, and spoke of his deep disappointment.

Cerdán has been asked to testify in court after a judge suggested he may have acted with former party officials in improperly awarding public contracts in exchange for kickbacks.

He said on Thursday he was stepping down to defend himself in the Supreme Court on 25 June, maintaining he had “never committed a crime nor have I been complicit one”.

Despite his seven years in power, Sánchez heads a shaky, minority coalition, secured after the conservative Popular Party won 2023 elections but failed to form a government.

Amid mounting speculation over his own future, he called a news conference in a bid to head off the creeping scandal.

In a statement followed by media questions, he said he knew absolutely nothing about the corruption affair and instead pledged to restructure the leadership of his Socialist PSOE party.

“This is not about me, and it’s not about the Socialist party,” he said.

His government would continue its “political project”, insisting that no new elections would take place until 2027.

However, Sánchez may face pressure from within his coalition, after deputy prime minister Yolanda Díaz from left-wing coalition partner Sumar said she also wanted explanations.

The opposition Popular Party has been buoyed by a weekend rally in the centre of Madrid that attracted tens of thousands of supporters, calling for Sánchez to go under a slogan “mafia or democracy”.

Party leader Alberto Núñez Feijóo appealed to other coalition parties to abandon the prime minister. There was no possible firewall, he told reporters on Thursday: “Corruption is already the hallmark of this government and it must end.”

Little over an hour earlier, Sánchez had made his first appearance answering media questions since a national power outage that hit Spain in April.

Speaking from Socialist party (PSOE) national headquarters in Madrid, the prime minister said he had until Thursday morning been persuaded of Santos Cerdán’s integrity and wanted to apologise to Spanish citizens.

“There is no such thing as zero corruption, but there must be zero tolerance when it takes place,” said Sánchez, the secretary-general of the PSOE. “We shouldn’t have trusted him.”

Sanchez accuses the opposition of conducting a smear campaign. Like many others he said he had his faults and asked the Spanish people for forgiveness.

He went on to accuse the conservatives of besieging his government on a multitude of issues and followed up his appearance with a message on social media, vowing to continue working for what he had always stood for: “clean politics and democratic renewal.”

Sánchez has faced repeated political crises and in April 2024 threatened to stand down.

He took five days to decide on his future, when a court decided to open preliminary proceedings against his wife over allegations surrounding her business dealings.

Then too he called a televised news conference, and in a moment of high drama announced he had decided to stay on in the job.

However, the Cerdán resignation represents a moment of political jeopardy for the prime minister.

Even though he is not personally implicated in the corruption allegations, one of his closest political allies is, along with two other officials.

Supreme Court Judge Leopoldo Puente acted after a lengthy report from Spain’s Civil Guard Central Operative Unit concluded that Socialist party organiser Cerdán would have had full knowledge of payments made in the alleged kickbacks scandal.

The judge said the report revealed that evidence suggested Cerdán had acted in collusion with a former Sánchez-era transport minister, José Luis Ábalos, and the minister’s ex-adviser Koldo García.

Ábalos lost his job in a reshuffle 2021 and was then forced to resign from the Socialist party as well in 2024. He remains an independent MP.

The police report is based on a number of recordings made by Koldo García over a four-year period and it estimates that the payments were worth €620,000 (£530,000).

Transcripts of some of the recordings appeared in Spanish media on Thursday alleging that Cerdán and Koldo García had discussed payments of substantial sums of money.

Koldo García and José Luis Ábalos have also been called to testify by the judge. The former minister denies he has done anything wrong.

It comes after the UK agreed a deal with the European Union over the territory’s post-Brexit future.

Spanish ham and olive oil producers are looking at other nations to replace sales in the US.

Cristiano Ronaldo is in tears as he wins a third trophy with Portugal – could the Nations League save his manager Roberto Martinez’s job?

Cristiano Ronaldo (the best player in his 40s in the world) comes up against Lamine Yamal (the best teenager in the world) in Sunday’s Nations League final. BBC Sport sees how they compare.

Police say smugglers used a network of speedboats to ferry drugs from South America to the Spanish islands.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Council tax expected to rise by 5% a year

Council tax is expected to rise by 5% a year to pay for local services, documents in the Spending Review suggest.

Bills are also expected to rise further to pay for an increase in police funding.

Local authorities have the power to raise the tax by up to 5% every year, although some choose lower increases.

However, Wednesday’s Spending Review assumes councils will raise it to the maximum level.

The review allocated a 1.1% increase in grant funding to local government, but said total spending power for councils would rise by 2.6%. That includes funds councils can raise from council tax, as well as things like business rates.

Councils can raise council tax by more than 5% if they hold a local referendum or get approval from central government.

Council tax has generally increased by the maximum of 5% a year recently amid strained town hall budgets. Some councils in particular financial difficulty have increased bills by significantly more.

On whether councils would have to raise council tax by 5%, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said nothing had been changed in terms of the 5% council tax cap, which was brought in by the previous government.

“It is a cap, councils don’t have to increase council tax by 5%,” she told BBC Breakfast.

“That’s to invest in things like social care, but also as is normal to put money into policing.”

Local services ranging from social care and libraries to bin collection and street cleaning are funded through council tax.

The Spending Review also says police spending power will rise by 2.3% a year in real terms.

Council tax includes a so-called police precept, which helps fund services such as regular community policing.

Police and Crime Commissioners can raise this precept by £14 a year for a Band D council tax bill without having to have a referendum. This is in addition to a 5% general rise.

Police budgets are made up of funding from both central government and local government and the increase in police spending power assumes a rise in the police precept, Treasury documents suggest.

“This includes projected spending from additional income, including estimated funding from the police council tax precept,” the documents say.

Police leaders have already called for greater funding, with some arguing extra money provided in the Spending Review would quickly go on covering officers’ pay

Louise Gittins, who chairs the Local Government Association, which represents councils, said there were some welcome areas of support in the Spending Review, including children’s services, affordable homes and investment in transport.

However, she said council budgets would remain under “severe financial pressure”.

“Many will continue to have to increase council tax bills to try and protect services but still need to make further cutbacks,” she said.

Tiff Lynch, acting chair of the Police Federation for England and Wales, which represents rank-and-file officers, said: “This Spending Review should have been a turning point after 15 years of austerity that has left policing and police officers broken. Instead, the cuts will continue and it’s the public who will pay the price.

“We await the government’s decision on police pay in the coming weeks. But with this Spending Review, the signs are deeply worrying; the consequences will be even more so.”

Jim McMahon said the council’s financial position was “deteriorating rapidly” and unable to improve.

The rain and high winds experienced during stormy weather can damage homes and cause power outages.

The chancellor highlights “uncertainty” in the world as economists warn of tax rises if the economy fails to grow.

Council tax bills in England are predicted to increase by the maximum amount every year until 2029.

Details about how the region could be split up to form unitary councils has been shared.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Mistrial declared on Weinstein rape charge after juror refuses to return

A New York judge declared a mistrial on a rape charge in Harvey Weinstein’s sex crimes trial after one juror refused to continue deliberations over an alleged attack in 2013 on actress Jessica Mann.

The jury had found Weinstein guilty of one count of sexual assault and not guilty of another count on Wednesday, but kept deliberating about a final rape charge.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said after the mistrial was announced that his office plans to retry the rape charge again – meaning a third trial for Weinstein in New York.

Thursday’s mistrial came after Weinstein’s earlier sex crimes conviction in the state was overturned last year, leading to new charges last September.

The rape charge was brought by actress Jessica Mann, who said in a statement on Thursday that she was prepared to testify again.

“I have told the District Attorney I am ready, willing and able to endure this as many times as it takes for justice and accountability to be served,” she said. “Today is not the end of my fight.”

At a news conference, Bragg said that after the judge declared a mistrial, he “immediately informed the court that we are ready to go forward to trial again on that charge, after conferring with Jessica Mann”.

A panel of seven female and five male jurors deliberated for six days in the six-week trial before one juror on Thursday declined to continue discussions.

Deliberations in the trial were plagued with tensions. The jury foreperson brought concerns to the judge earlier this week, saying jurors were “attacking” one another and trying to change his mind.

On Wednesday, he brought more complaints to the judge, indicating that “at least one other juror made comments to the effect of ‘I’ll meet you outside one day,’ and there’s yelling and screaming”, Judge Curtis Farber told the court.

On Thursday, the foreperson said he would not go back to the jury room to deliberate because he was afraid of others yelling at him, so the judge declared a mistrial on the last rape charge.

“Sometimes jury deliberations become heated. I understand this particular deliberation was more needed than some others,” Judge Farber told the 12-person jury, according to US media.

In a statement, a Weinstein spokesperson said his team believed the conviction would be “set aside” due to “gross juror misconduct”.

“8 years, dozens of accusers, three trials, one conviction,” spokesperson Juda Engelmayer said. “Harvey is disappointed in the single verdict, but hasn’t loss faith or the heart to continue fighting to clear his name.”

An appeals court overturned Weinstein’s previous conviction for sex crimes in New York last April, finding the 73-year-old did not receive a fair trial in 2020 because a judge allowed testimony from women who made allegations against him beyond the charges at hand.

The 2025 trial was based on the testimony of three women – Ms Mann, former television production assistant Miriam Haley, and Polish model Kaja Sokola. All three accused Weinstein of using his power in the entertainment industry to sexually abuse them. Ms Haley and Ms Mann both testified in the first trial against Weinstein, when he was found guilty.

This time, the jury found Weinstein guilty of sexually assaulting Ms Haley, but acquitted him of assaulting Ms Sokola.

The latest conviction is in addition to a 16-year sentence that Weinstein has yet to serve after being convicted of sex crimes in Los Angeles.

Jury deliberations proved tense last week as well, when one juror said others were “shunning” one member of the panel, calling it “playground stuff”.

The foreperson also claimed jurors were considering Weinstein’s past and other allegations outside the realm of the case in making decisions.

This led the judge to give the jury an instruction about only considering the allegations in the case, and nothing else.

Weinstein – who has cancer and diabetes – stayed at Bellevue Hospital rather than Riker’s Island jail during the trial. He sat in a wheelchair for the proceedings.

In total, Weinstein has been accused of sexual misconduct, assault and rape by more than 100 women. While not all reports resulted in criminal charges, the California conviction means he is likely to spend the rest of his life in prison.

Weinstein and his brother Bob were among the biggest figures in Hollywood, founding Miramax film studio, whose hits included Shakespeare in Love, which won the Oscar for best picture, and Pulp Fiction.

Miriam Haley says she risked her own privacy for the sake of other female victims of sexual abuse.

Production assistant Miriam Haley is the first accuser to testify at the disgraced Hollywood mogul’s retrial.

Weinstein, who has pleaded not guilty to sex crimes, returns to court after a conviction was overturned.

Shiori Ito became the face of Japan’s MeToo movement after she accused a prominent journalist of rape.

The disgraced Hollywood producer told the judge he could no longer endure conditions in jail.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Strip-search police told girl she may be arrested

A black schoolgirl who was strip-searched by Metropolitan Police officers was told she “might be arrested” if she refused to comply, a misconduct panel has heard.

The girl, known as Child Q, was strip-searched at her school by officers in Hackney, east London, on 3 December 2020 after her teachers wrongly suspected her of carrying cannabis.

This involved the removal of the 15-year-old’s clothing including underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body while she was menstruating, the panel has heard.

Trainee Det Con Kristina Linge, PC Victoria Wray and PC Rafal Szmydynski, who were all constables at the time, deny gross misconduct over their treatment of the girl.

On Thursday, Det Con Linge, who conducted the strip-search alongside PC Wray, told the misconduct panel in south-east London she informed Child Q she “might be arrested” when the girl asked what could happen if she refused to be searched – but claimed there had been “no threat of arrest”.

Elliot Gold, for the Independent Office for Police Conduct, asked: “Will you accept you were giving Child Q the option of being strip-searched or arrested?”

“There were no options given like that,” the officer replied.

“Do you accept that saying that to a 15-year-old might make them feel frightened?” Mr Gold said.

“Yes,” Det Con Linge responded.

The panel heard that when asked previously what the officer had proposed to do if she found cannabis on Child Q, Det Con Linge had answered: “As per legislation, a juvenile found in possession must be arrested and brought to custody.”

Det Con Linge previously said Child Q had consented to the search, but admitted under cross-examination by Mr Gold that this was not accurate.

Det Con Linge joined the Met Police in 2018 and was still in her probationary period when the search took place.

The officer confirmed she had completed equality training, including on unconscious bias and discriminatory stereotypes, and said she was aware of stereotypes relating to black people.

She told the hearing she did not “see the relevance” of the fact Child Q was being questioned by two white police officers.

Mr Gold asked whether she would accept that “a stereotype of black people is they may more likely be stopped and searched” and if she would accept that they are more likely to be “in receipt of use of force by police”.

Det Con Linge replied “no” to both questions.

The 46-year-old agreed there was no adult present in the room where the search happened who could have offered the child advice, assisted her in communication with police or ensured her rights were respected.

Det Con Linge also denied she “did not recognise Child Q as a child” and was, in effect, “treating her as older than she was”.

The hearing continues.

Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk

Hindu temples in Harrow and Neasden are offering special prayers for the Air India crash victims.

One British man, who was a passenger on the London-bound flight, survived the crash in Ahmedabad, western India.

Shortly after Shamiah McKenzie and Codee Godfrey carried out the attack, they mingled with police officers.

Six tourists staying at the Nana Backpackers hostel died in November from suspected methanol poisoning.

The video from police body-worn cameras showed what jurors heard was the bravery of the officers.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Teen kickboxer died of brain injury after fight with no safeguards, coroner rules

A 15-year-old three-time world kickboxing champion died from a severe traumatic brain injury after an unsanctioned fight which had no safeguards, a coroner has ruled.

Alex Eastwood, from Fazakerley, Liverpool, suddenly collapsed after the charity bout in Wigan against a 17-year-old opponent and died three days later, on 29 June last year.

Coroner Michael Pemberton said the fight was unsanctioned and the safeguards that were meant to exist “simply didn’t”. He described the regulation of kickboxing as “chaotic and disjointed”.

Alex’s family said the inquest had made clear his death was “not a tragic accident”, but was “a failure of safeguarding and regulation”.

Mr Pemberton, who returned a finding of misadventure, had already taken the unusual step of writing a Prevention of Future Death Report airing his concerns about a lack of regulatory guidance in terms of any child combat sports.

He said: “During the course of this hearing the evidence has reflected a chaotic and somewhat disjointed approach in which I’m not satisfied participants or parents are made fully aware of the risks that may ensue.”

Kickboxing GB, one of the governing bodies of the sport, said while it did not sanction the Wigan fight, it would consider the coroner’s findings carefully and “review policies and procedures accordingly”.

Alex, who had just finished his GCSEs at Archbishop Beck RC High School, fought three rounds at the TKMA Gym before becoming seriously unwell.

The coroner said emergency services had done everything they could to try to save him.

Addressing the boy’s parents, Mr Pemberton said: “The circumstances of this tragic case have left many numb.

“I’m sure there will be an encore of issues to seek changes on as part of his legacy.”

He referred to the lack of pre-bout meeting between the fighters, referee and coaches to lay down the “ground rules” for the bout.

The inquest heard Dale Bannister, organiser and owner of the TKMA gym, said the “ground rules” for the match had been agreed during social media exchanges between himself and Alex’s coach as a “light contact” fight.

But the coroner said: “The planning of the event and lack of risk assessment was sub-optimal in this regard.”

Outside the hearing, Alex’s step-mother Nikita Eastwood said: “No child should go into a gym to do something they love and not come home.

“What happened to him was not just a tragic accident – the inquest has made clear to us that it was a failure of safeguarding, of responsibility, and of regulation.

“Alex died after a fight that we now see should never have happened.”

She said there had been no national governing body involvement, and no clear or enforced safety standards, adding: “Alex’s death must be a line in the sand so that these failures change.”

The family called for “national protections for children in combat sports”.

Lisa Nandy, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, has written to the coroner and said officials in her department were now looking at the best way to address the concerns raised about the safety of children taking part in combat sports.

Ian Hollett, Alex’s coach from Hurricane Combat and Fitness said the club was “utterly devastated” by the loss of a “wonderful, kind and exceptionally talented boy”.

He added: “We thank the coroner for his thorough investigation and fully welcome any recommendations made that will help prevent another tragedy like this happening again.”

The club’s solicitor, David Pearson, said: “This unimaginable tragedy has brought into sharp focus the need for further regulation in all combat sports involving children across the country.”

Kickboxing GB said: “Whilst the event which Alex attended was not a Kickboxing GB sanctioned event, we have provided assistance to the coroner throughout this inquest.”

The body said it would consider the coroner’s findings carefully and “review policies and procedures accordingly”.

Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

David Walliams Nazi salute unacceptable, BBC says

The BBC has said it was “unacceptable” for David Walliams to make two Nazi salutes during a recording of comedy panel show Would I Lie To You? this week.

The comedian and children’s author made the gestures during a segment in which a fellow panellist discussed a story about injuring their wrist while waving.

Walliams reportedly joined in with increasingly vigorous waves, which culminated in him holding out his arm in a Nazi salute.

The show’s production company and the BBC both described the gestures as “completely unacceptable” and said the segment would not be broadcast.

BBC News has asked representatives for Walliams for comment.

The former Britain’s Got Talent judge was on the panel for the BBC One show’s Christmas special, which was recorded at Pinewood Studios on Tuesday.

Journalist Sebastian Topan, who was in the audience, contacted the BBC to describe what happened.

One part of the show saw Call The Midwife actress Helen George, who took part in Strictly Come Dancing in 2015, being given a prompt to suggest she had sprained her wrist “from waving too much during the Strictly tour”.

She then had to try to convince the opposing team that her anecdote was true.

After demonstrating the wave, which purportedly left her with an injury, she was told that it was “too little” and was encouraged to make a bigger gesture.

“Some other panellist was talking when David Walliams started doing the Nazi salute,” Topan told the BBC. “I was shocked at what I had seen.”

There were “patches of quietened gasps and awkward half-laughs and broken clapping” in the audience, they said.

The show’s host, Gavin & Stacey star Rob Brydon, then told Walliams the show would be broadcast before the 9pm watershed, effectively suggesting his behaviour was not suitable for a family TV audience.

However, as the discussion about George’s experience continued, Walliams made the gesture again, adding a sexual gesture with his other hand.

It’s understood the exchange landed awkwardly in the studio. “The atmosphere was uncomfortable and weird,” Topan said.

“I think Rob Brydon wanted to get past it as quickly as he could. David Walliams’ team-mates looked unsure what to do and were not laughing… It was like an elephant in the room after that as the incident was early on in the recording and so the remainder of the show felt weird.”

After the recording, a different member of the audience posted on X: “I didn’t have David Walliams doing a Nazi salute at the Would I Lie To You? Christmas taping on my 2025 bingo card.”

A spokesperson for Banijay UK, which owns the show’s production company Zeppotron, said: “Any attempt at humour regarding this deeply offensive gesture, whether broadcast or not, is completely unacceptable in any context.

“It was immediately acknowledged during the recording that this segment would not be broadcast under any circumstances and we apologise to those who were at the recording for any offence caused.”

A BBC spokesperson said: “The use of such an offensive gesture is completely unacceptable and we apologise to all at the recording for the offence caused.”

Walliams, who also hosts a podcast with his former Little Britain co-star Matt Lucas, has not appeared on terrestrial television since 2022.

He left his role as a judge on ITV show Britain’s Got Talent that year after an audio recording of him making insulting comments about contestants were made public.

The comic was suing the production company after private comments he made were leaked to the media.

TV watchdog Ofcom publishes research into viewers’ opinions about potentially offensive content.

The former judge on the ITV talent show is suing the Fremantle, the production company behind it.

Walliams files a High Court case against the show’s production company following his exit as a judge.

In November, Walliams admitted making “disrespectful comments” about two past contestants.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Chris Mason: Reeves and Starmer can’t escape sluggish economy

We are reminded rather starkly today of the backdrop – the all too hard to shift backdrop – that shapes our national life and conversation and the trade-offs the government confronts.

The latest GDP figures underline the baked in sluggishness, the flatlining, even the shrivelling of the economy.

All this after the prime minister and the chancellor sought to badge their Spending Review on Wednesday as the beginning of a new chapter.

Rachel Reeves hopes her prescription can be part of the cure for our collective economic woes, writing in The Daily Telegraph that “investment” is “with a singular purpose in mind – to make you and your family better off.”

But that feels, just as it did under the previous government, like an aspiration for another day, some distance away, rather than an imminent prospect.

The economic sluggishness has another impact too. There is a widespread recognition, including in the Treasury, that the limits are being reached on what the government can sustainably borrow.

If there is an acceptance there can’t be any more borrowing and the economy remains in the slow lane, that points to more tax rises in the Budget in the autumn.

Meanwhile, the chancellor has asked her MPs to go out and sell the government’s plan – just as some of them grumble that both she and the prime minister are no good at doing that themselves.

There is a frustration from some at the apparent inability of Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves to talk in pictures, to punchily, directly and repeatedly articulate in a way that is absorbed what the government is about and who it is for.

Is the defining mission clear enough? Is this a government with a demeanour and posture that matches its majority?

No, is the private judgement of some on its own side, let alone their critics, and some in business.

We are witnessing, says Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, “a decade of a growing state”.

“Over the parliament as a whole total departmental spending is set to grow at 2.3% a year above economy-wide inflation. It is worth recalling that it grew at 3.6% a year over the 2019-24 parliament,” Johnson adds – when the Conservatives were in charge.

And one final observation – just because of its scale. A growing part of that growing state is the health service.

By 2028-29 the day to day spending on the NHS for the year will be nearly a quarter of a trillion pounds.

£226bn is around the same as the total economic output of the Portuguese economy.

And still the question is asked by some about whether that is enough, as others ponder for how long numbers this big and rising can possibly be sustainable.

Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.

Salisbury MP John Glen asked the chancellor for an update, only to be told it was the Health Secretary’s decision.

The big bet for the government remains on economic growth – finding it and sustaining it.

Some departments, including the Home Office and Foreign Office, have lost out in the government’s Spending Review.

SNP say Scotland has been “short changed” but the chancellor claims it is the largest settlement since devolution.

Projects in the South West were not included in the chancellor’s spending review on Wednesday.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Jesús polished luxury vehicles at an LA car wash for years. Then ICE showed up

When US immigration agents pulled up outside a Los Angeles car wash on a quiet Sunday afternoon, it sparked instant chaos.

Some customers at the Westchester Hand Wash, which sits in the centre of a busy shopping area just blocks from the city’s airport, froze as the officers in olive-green uniforms approached, CCTV footage obtained by the BBC shows.

Two employees who spotted them ducked behind a luxury SUV they were wiping down with a rag. Another worker halfway through cleaning the back window of a car looked up.

Then all at once they scattered and ran, some jumping over a nearby fence as agents raced after them on foot and in US Customs and Border Protection pick-up trucks.

Agents came the following day to make more arrests.

Jesús Cruz, who has worked at the car wash for more than a decade and lived in the US for more than 30 years, was among the six men who were arrested over the course of two raids.

His wife, Noemi Ciau, told the BBC she was shopping with her daughter when she spotted a social media post about a possible raid. It included a photo of the car wash, so she dropped her daughter at home and raced there.

By the time she arrived, however, she was too late. She has not been able to reach her husband since.

“You are so used to having a partner there, just to help you out, to be the backbone… now it’s like – how am I going to do it?” she said.

“My husband has no criminal background. He’s never gotten a ticket before. We pay our taxes. We’re up to date on everything.”

She did not confirm they were in the US legally. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to an inquiry about Mr Cruz’s legal status, or the goal of the operation at the car wash.

That raid and similar ones across Los Angeles by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) represent a significant escalation in the White House’s strategy to round up and deport undocumented migrants.

On the campaign trail, President Donald Trump repeatedly said he would prioritise deporting noncitizens accused of violent crimes. That promise received widespread support, even among Hispanic immigrant groups.

But in recent weeks, the administration has stepped up its targets, pushing to increase their arrests from about 660 to 3,000 a day.

To do that, they have widened their net, targeting not just criminals but workplaces such as farms and factories in an effort to detain more undocumented migrants.

“Just go out there and arrest illegal aliens,” Stephen Miller, a top White House adviser, reportedly told Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials before they launched the recent LA raids.

According to the Wall Street Journal, he told them they did not need to produce target lists of suspected illegal immigrants, a longstanding practice, and should instead raid major businesses to arrest as many as possible.

Car-wash owner Mehmet Aydogan said the agents did not ask for IDs before placing the men in handcuffs and swiftly driving them away.

“They were not doing anything criminal,” he said, noting the raids were quick and lasted less than a minute. “Everyone is hardworking.”

Days earlier, there was another operation at Ambiance Apparel, a clothing wholesale business in the Fashion District near downtown LA.

More than a dozen people were arrested, witnesses said, although DHS did not respond to a BBC inquiry about this operation and the total number of arrests.

Border tsar Tom Homan denied that agents were conducting an immigration raid at Ambiance. He said it was a criminal investigation that also uncovered undocumented immigrants.

“I said it from day one: if you’re in the country illegally, you’re not off the table,” he told the New York Times recently.

Enrique Lopez was one of several witnesses who started posting on Instagram about the operation, before a large group of protesters formed outside, trying to prevent the workers from being taken away.

Officials eventually deployed flash bangs and tear gas to push past the crowd – one of the first protests in the LA area as the spate of immigration raids kicked off.

“It’s sad that it’s hardworking people,” he said about those arrested. “And they’re trying to make it seem like it’s bad people.”

Protests first broke out on 6 June, with confrontations between demonstrators and federal agents in the streets, before spreading more widely and at times turning violent. Hundreds have been arrested and an overnight curfew in one area is being enforced.

Immigration enforcement agencies have said the protests will not deter their operations. President Trump has deployed the National Guard and US Marines to help ensure the immigration crackdown continues.

These raids have hit Los Angeles County especially hard, where estimates suggest more than 900,000 people do not have legal status – about 10% of the population.

Hispanics here outnumber any other ethnic background by a large margin – and many in the community who are citizens or legal residents have family who are undocumented.

“I can’t emphasise enough the level of fear and terror that is in Angelenos right now,” the city’s Mayor Karen Bass said at news conference.

“Not knowing if it’s tomorrow or tonight. It might be where they live. It might be their workplace. Should you send your kids to school? Should you go to work?”

Social media has been used to inform communities about sightings of immigration authorities, but also to spread misinformation.

The unease caused one local minority non-profit to urge undocumented people to just stay out of sight. It offered volunteers to run errands or go grocery shopping for families so they can remain indoors.

Residents say it’s a mystery when and where immigration officers will show up next.

Immigration agencies do not typically announce where raids have happened, nor do they announce all arrests or where detainees are being held or jailed – adding to the anxiety.

But what exactly comes next as raids continue is still unknown.

Raids nationwide in recent days have netted hundreds of arrests, including recent operations in agricultural sectors and a meat-packing plant in Nebraska. In response, protests have spurred in all corners of the country – including in major cities like New York, Dallas, Washington and Boston.

“California may be first – but it clearly won’t end here,” California Governor Gavin Newsom said in an evening address on Tuesday. “Other states are next.”

Immigration attorney Karla Navarrete, who is representing multiple people who have been arrested in the immigration sweeps, said the mass arrests have overwhelmed the system.

Databases aren’t being updated with arrests, families and lawyers cannot find those who have been detained and when they do the person sometimes is in a different state or has already been deported to another country.

Ms Ciau, whose husband was arrested at the car wash, said she learned late on Tuesday that he was no longer in Los Angeles, or even the state of California.

She was told by her lawyer that Mr Cruz is being held at a detention centre in El Paso, Texas, more than 800 miles (1,300km) from their home.

Her youngest child – a five-year-old boy – is having the hardest time with the change, she said.

“He just keeps asking for his dad. I don’t know what to tell him,” she added, through tears.

“He doesn’t understand what is going on. He still thinks his dad is at work.”

The US defense secretary appeared to acknowledge incidental plans also exist for Panama, but avoided giving direct confirmation.

US Senator Alex Padilla was put in handcuffs after interrupting Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a news update on the Los Angeles ICE raids.

The appointees have “committed to demanding definitive safety and efficacy data”, the vaccine sceptic said.

US President Donald Trump will oversee a huge military parade in Washington DC on the same day as nationwide protests are planned.

Hawaii’s Kilauea volcano, one of the world’s most active, erupted for the 25th time since 23 December 2024.

Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Tidak Ada Lagi Postingan yang Tersedia.

Tidak ada lagi halaman untuk dimuat.