Bale part of US-based consortium’s Plymouth takeover bid

Five-time Champions League winner, Gareth Bale retired in January 2023

Former Real Madrid and Wales star Gareth Bale is part of a US-based consortium's attempt to take over League One club Plymouth Argyle.

Talks with the private equity firm are said to be at an early stage.

Plymouth owner Simon Hallett said last month that a previous agreement to sell a stake in the club had fallen through.

Bale would be following the lead of former Real Madrid team-mate Luka Modric, who has become part of the group that acquired control of Swansea in November 2024.

The Croatia midfielder took on a minority stake in April this year with the stated aim of generating worldwide attention on the Welsh club.

Legendary NFL quarterback Tom Brady previously became part of the new Birmingham City's ownership group, while Wrexham have generated huge amounts of revenue from publicity attached to their Hollywood owners Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney.

Plymouth were relegated to the third tier last season after an ill-fated return to the Championship.

The ambitious pre-season appointment of Wayne Rooney as manager did not work and his replacement Miron Muslic resigned at the end of the season and joined German club Schalke.

Former Manchester United midfielder and Watford boss Tom Cleverley was appointed as manager on 13 June.

It is not known what role, if any, five-time Champions League winner Bale will have at Plymouth should the planned takeover succeed.

The former Southampton and Tottenham man, 35, retired from playing in 2023.

Evans causes upset but Norrie knocked out at Queen’s

It was a mixed opening day of the men's tournament for British players at Queen's

Great Britain's Dan Evans claimed one of the biggest wins of his career when he upset world number 13 Frances Tiafoe to progress to the last 16 at Queen's but compatriot Cameron Norrie was knocked out on the opening day.

British number two Jacob Fearnley also advanced, making light work of qualifier Alex Bolt in a 6-2 6-4 victory.

Evans won 7-5 6-2 for his first win against a top-20 player since he defeated world number 12 Alex de Minaur at the 2023 Davis Cup.

It was only a second career win over a top-20 opponent on grass for Evans following his victory over 16th-ranked Nikoloz Basilashvili at Wimbledon six years ago.

But Norrie's hopes of replicating his run to the final at Queen's in 2021 were ended by 19-year-old Jakub Mensik, who won 7-6 (8-6) 1-6 6-1 in the baking heat in west London.

The win means Mensik becomes just the second teenager to win a main draw match at Queen's in the last decade, after British number one Jack Draper in 2021.

Evans will next play either American Brandon Nakashima or Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard of France, while Fearnley could be handed a tough test against third seed Taylor Fritz, who plays Corentin Moutet in his first-round match.

Meanwhile, Mensik will next face Roberto Bautista Agut for a place in the quarter-finals.

Raducanu renaissance continues – Second Serve

GB's Klugman beaten on WTA main-draw debut

Boultucanu & home comforts – how historic Queen's unfolded

Watch mega rally as GB's Evans goes against Tiafoe

Evans is looking to rebuild his ranking, having dropped from a career-high 21st in the world a couple of years ago to 199th.

Given a wildcard entry at Queen's, the 35-year-old was handed a tough start against American Tiafoe, who reached the quarter-finals of the French Open this year.

But Tiafoe has often struggled on grass and Evans took full advantage, playing some of his best tennis in years to claim an impressive straight-set win.

Evans dropped more than 110 ranking spots last year when he opted to focus on partnering Andy Murray in the doubles at the Paris Olympics, so it was apt that this impressive display came at the arena newly named after the Scot.

The pair reached the quarter-finals at Roland Garros, with the match the last of Murray's long and illustrious career.

Asked afterwards about how much Murray has inspired his own career, Evans said: "Not just mine but the whole of British tennis.

"He always has time for everyone and it's fitting he has an arena called after him.

"The Olympics was one of the best things I've done. It is something that will stick with me forever and I am immensely proud to have played with him [Murray]."

Evans, encouraged by the vocal home crowd, looked comfortable from the outset, catching the eye as he came out on top of a gruelling 37-shot rally on his way to taking the first set.

A five-game winning streak saw him take command of the second set as Tiafoe increasingly showed signs of being frustrated that things were not going his way.

"Days like today, whatever happens this week, is why I've been carrying on – to get out here and put my game on the court and enjoy it," Evans added.

"I'm delighted with the win. It was probably one of my best performances I've ever played."

Like Evans, Norrie also showed spells of playing impressive tennis against Mensik and a dominant second-set display – after being edged in the first – suggested momentum was with him.

That theme continued into the start of the decisive third set as Norrie had two break points but Mensik dug deep to save them both and secure the hold.

That was to prove pivotal as Mensik now had the momentum and a double fault on the Norrie serve helped the Czech player secure the break.

Mensik's confidence grew as Norrie struggled to respond and he cemented the win with an ace – his 19th of the match.

"He served unbelievably well," Norrie said.

"Credit to him. I felt I was the better player in the first set and continued in the second. I felt like he dropped but I didn't serve well in the third and he ran away with it."

Meanwhile, Fearnley made the most of the slightly cooler conditions when he emerged last inside the Andy Murray Arena, despatching Australian Bolt in just over one hour.

It was a confident display by Fearnley in his first appearance at the Queen's Club as he continued his impressive progress, having this year climbed into the top 50 after being ranked outside the top 500 in the world in May 2024.

In another of the grass-court events leading up to Wimbledon, there were wins at the Halle Open for former world number one Daniil Medvedev and Stefanos Tsitsipas – unseeded for the first time since 2018.

Greece's Tsitsipas, in his first tournament working with new coach Goran Ivanisevic, edged past Italy's Luciano Darderi 6-4 3-6 7-6 (7-5) in Germany and Medvedev eased past home hope Daniel Altmaier 6-3 6-3.

Live scores, results and order of play

Get tennis news sent straight to your phone

‘What’s eating Rory?’ – will US Open prove reset point for McIlroy?

Watch: Rory McIlroy speaking after his final round at the US Open.

Even when a US Open throws up as many talking points as last week's 125th edition at Oakmont did, the name that still dominated discussion was Rory McIlroy.

The Masters champion never contended on this beast of a course, which produced a surprise and fairytale winner in JJ Spaun when he holed a monster putt to thunderously seal his triumph in truly dramatic style.

Britons Robert MacIntrye and Tyrrell Hatton emerged as genuine major contenders. They did so on a capricious course that, heading into the final round, produced a leaderboard with only one major winner in the top 10.

During a soggy final day Spaun overcame a nightmare start to storm to victory while forlorn contenders such as 2013 Masters winner Adam Scott and Sam Burns were subjected to a form of golfing brutality that might disturb their sleep for months to come.

But still, post-championship chatter in the bars of Pittsburgh and beyond centred around the 36-year-old Northern Irishman who completed the career Grand Slam when he won the Masters in April.

Watch: Frustrated McIlroy has 'earned the right to do whatever I want'

"What's eating at Rory?" was the question so many people want to discuss, especially after his terse news conference following Saturday's third round in Pennsylvania.

It was the first time he had spoken to the media post round at a major since that never-to-be-forgotten outpouring of relief and joy which followed his thrilling play-off win at Augusta National.

McIlroy blanked reporters after every round at last month's US PGA Championship, where news emerged that hisdriver had failed a conforming testat Quail Hollow. Its face was worn out.

Nothing sinister in that, but the test results are supposed to remain confidential.

The player was irked that this was reported, initially by the tournament's in-house radio station. It never mentioned that the driver of eventual champion Scottie Scheffler had also failed its test.

Never before had McIlroy failed to speak post round for an entire major.

Although he spoke on the Tuesday prior to the US Open he was noticeably tetchy and short with reporters, especially those who brought up the driver issue.

His dark mood seemed at odds with someone who was expected to carry a sunny disposition for evermore, having finally reached all-time great status with his Grand Slam success at the year's first major.

As incredibly satisfying as that ultra-rare achievement must be, it does not guarantee eternal happiness. Life moved on after his richly deserved back-slapping and feted appearances on the chat show circuit.

McIlroy keen to 'climb another mountain' at Portrush

Spaun birdies last two to win US Open from MacIntyre

I've earned the right to do whatever I want to do – McIlroy

But how does it move on, when the task that had consumed him and driven him for more than a decade was finally completed? What forces someone in such a position to go back to the well of intense practice and self scrutiny?

"Physically I feel like my game is there, it is just mentally getting myself in the right frame of mind to get the best out of myself," McIlroy said after his 67 at Oakmont last Sunday.

It was the joint lowest score on that dramatic final day. But one of the reasons he was suddenly speaking more openly, and therefore more like his usual self, was less to do with finally playing well and more about who he was talking to.

Unlike the previous day, there were only a handful of reporters waiting to collect his thoughts – BBC Northern Ireland and representatives from the Irish press. People who have followed every twist and turn of McIlroy's remarkable career.

Those familiar faces carry the five-time major champion's respect.

He was open enough to admit: "I climbed my Everest in April and I think after you do something like that you've got to make your way back down and look for another mountain to climb."

By contrast, the previous day he had been surrounded by a swarm of reporters, predominantly American. McIlroy was offhand, cold and curt.

"I've earned the right to do whatever I want to do," he said. He came across as entitled and arrogant, even though the context of this comment was merely in terms of his dealings with the media.

No player is compelled to speak after a round unlike in other sports, such as football and tennis where such obligations are mandatory regardless of result. As long as such obligations remain voluntary he will exercise his right not to speak.

So golf administrators and their broadcast partners must be considering whether they should adopt a similar stance to tennis. Collin Morikawa blanked reporters after losing the Arnold Palmer Invitational at Bay Hill in March.

He later said: "I don't owe anyone anything." That was an entitled opinion from someone with career earnings edging towards the $50m mark.

The tours, though, would struggle to impose mandatory interviews because they are organisations effectively run by the players themselves.

Not so the majors. Augusta National, the PGA of America, USGA and R&A – who are responsible for the Masters, US PGA, US Open and The Open respectively – might, and probably should, consider making such a regime a condition of entry.

This is especially the case while there is an increasing perception of a growing distance between top players and a mainstream media that can do so much to oil the PR machine that helps feed such gargantuan bank balances.

And it seems in many cases, the more money they get, the less approachable these players become. They are also seemingly more prone to temper tantrums.

In the past two majors there have been foul-mouthed, club-throwing outbursts from several players – including the usually mild-mannered world number one Scheffler, who tossed his putter on the 15th green after a missed putt. Courses and locker rooms have felt the full force of fury from some of the best remunerated athletes on the planet.

McIlroy, by no means the main offender, lobbed a club and smashed a tee marker during this US Open, which was uncharacteristic from someone who in the injury-induced absence of Tiger Woods is the sport's greatest ambassador and most popular player.

While not a great look, he had clearly, and understandably, reached boiling point last week. Reporting of 'driver-gate' and his perceived lack of respect for Jack Nicklaus, for not telling the legendary American he would not be playing in his recent Memorial tournament – which had never been on his intended schedule – had irked him.

His game was in decline. He was struggling to find a new driver that fitted his feels and the drive to fix such problems on the range. Despite super-human achievement, he is only human.

McIlroy had reached a breaking point. It can happen to anyone, even someone who is usually so giving and interesting in his interviews.

He did not want to speak after Saturday's round, but he did and in so doing broke his silent treatment of the media.

What emerged from that huddle did not show him in his best light, but it might prove a reset point.

And by the end of the week his driver was starting to behave. It is the key attribute to his golfing prowess.

On Sunday night he was much more his old self, speaking of his desire to get back to Europe, where a new house at Wentworth awaits as well as an Open at Royal Portrush in his native Northern Ireland.

He plays the Travellers in Connecticut this week and then he is done with America for a while. He will take a break before July's Scottish Open and then a potentially tumultuous end to the men's major season on the Antrim coast a week later.

Expect his mojo to be back there. As he says, if it is not then we know he has a problem.

Spaun seals US Open victory with longest putt of the week

WSL expanding to 14 teams – but relegation remains

London City Lionesses are the first independently-owned club in the WSL

The Women's Super League will expand from 12 to 14 teams from the 2026-27 season – but the threat of relegation will remain.

At the end of next season, the top two sides from the second tier, WSL 2, will automatically be promoted.

In addition, the third-placed team in the WSL 2 will face a play-off with the WSL's bottom side for a place in the top flight.

The plans were approved on Monday following a vote by clubs.

The announcement ends months of speculation about changes following suggestions in March thatrelegation could temporarily be scrappedin the WSL.

This notion prompted a backlash, but WSL bosses had always insisted no firm proposal on this had been put forward and they were simply weighing up the pros and cons of ways to increase the size of the league.

What's going on with falling WSL attendances?

WSL revenues soared 34% during 2023-24 season

The proposal was presented at a shareholders' meeting on Monday by WSL Football – the company that assumed control of the top two tiers from the Football Association (FA) in August 2024.

The FA will now meet to formally sign off the changes, which must be implemented before 31 July. This is seen as a formality following the clubs' votes.

Currently, only the WSL 2 winners earn promotion, with the bottom club in the WSL relegated – essentially one up and one down.

These are the changes that will take place next season to achieve expansion of the league:

WSL 2 champion – automatic promotion

WSL 2 runners-up – automatic promotion

WSL 2 third-place – play-off match

WSL bottom club – play-off match

However, that will change as the WSL expands from 12 teams to 14 teams for the 26-27 season. From then onwards, there will be one automatic promotion spot for the winner of WSL 2, with the bottom team in the WSL relegated.

In addition, there will be a play-off between second bottom of the WSL and runners up in WSL 2.

The FA will decide the next steps for the lower tiers.

It is expected the winners from the National League Premier Division North and the National League Premier Division South will gain automatic promotion into the WSL 2 next season.

The runners-up from those third-tier divisions would then take part in a play-off match for the final promotion spot in the second tier.

It is expected there will be two teams relegated from WSL 2 from 2026-27 onwards, and two automatic promotions from the third tiers.

All clubs must meet the licence criteria to play in the WSL 2 and the WSL.

Expansion is just the first step in WSL Football's 10-year plan.

Substantial changes have been made to the licence criteria to improve minimum standards as WSL Football aims for two fully-professional top tiers in England.

Requirements now include improved facilities, extra player contact hours, additional staffing and focus on club academies.

Analysis carried out by the body showed there were not enough games where the outcome had an effect on standings in the WSL. There is a belief that several clubs have stayed in the top flight for too long without threat of relegation and have not progressed as a result.

In the second tier, some clubs have elite standards, others have semi-professional environments and many have toyed between the two in the past decade.

However, with three WSL 2 clubs potentially earning promotion there may be more movement in the leagues going forward – and more incentive for clubs to invest.

Arsenal won the Women's Champions League for a second time in 2025

Expanding the WSL means clubs will play 26 matches, not 22, from the 2026-27 season. But space in the calendar is already limited.

Schedule constraints include Fifa'sWomen's Club World Cup, a competition that will run every four years starting from 2028, the introduction of a Women's Champions Cup from 2026 and the expansion of theWomen's World Cup to 48 teams from 2031.

In addition, Women's Champions League semi-finals take place on weekends – unlike in the men's game – and WSL matches are not played on the same weekend as the Women's FA Cup.

There are also guidelines around player welfare including a six-week break after a major tournament, a two-week winter break, a maximum of two midweek games in a row and no midweek games directly following an international break. This all reduces the available dates to play the additional games.

Plus WSL clubs must navigate fixture clashes with their male team counterparts in shared stadiums, asArsenal experienced in November.

Discussions take place between governing bodies – Uefa, Fifa, the Premier League and the FA – but they often each have their own priorities.

Meanwhile, preferred kick-off times and broadcasting requests can cause discord among clubs.

There are plans to scrap the Saturday 18:45 evening slot on Sky Sports as average attendances at that time have been low across the WSL.

What is the Women's Champions Cup?

What is the secret to Arsenal's WSL crowd success?

The stringent licence revisions have caused backlash.

Blackburn Women withdrew from the WSL 2after claiming the financial requirements "can no longer be sustained".

Third-tier clubWolves Women did not apply for a WSL 2 licenceas owners were unwilling to move to a full-time model, as is required.

Barnsley Women, playing in the fourth tier,folded in Junebecause of financial pressures, claiming "funding does not trickle down sufficiently".

Sources at WSL Football say it is working closely with National League clubs to raise minimum standards but the company is aware of short-term financial pressures.

There are also concerns WSL clubs will continue to build a bigger gap.

Chelsea'ssale of their women's team to themselves- a move to navigate Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) – raised questions on whether more financial regulations should be put in place in the women's game.

The WSL currently has a "soft" salary cap, allowing clubs to spend up to 40% of their revenue on player salaries.

A stricter financial regulation has not been ruled out for the future but WSL Football is wary of stifling growth.

WSL Football chief executive Nikki Doucet says the "priority was to find a route that would benefit the whole women's game pyramid" and they hope these changes are the "next evolution" in professionalism.

She added: "We believe this will raise minimum standards, create distinction and incentivise investment across the board.

"The introduction of a promotion-relegation play-off creates distinction for the women's game and introduces a high-profile, high-stakes match."

WSL expansion is likely to be welcomed by clubs such as Birmingham City and Newcastle United, who have had an influx in investment recently.

Calls for the WSL to growhave existed for a number of years.

Get the latest WSL news on our dedicated page

Chelsea play in front of 50,000 empty seats – apathy or bad scheduling?

The top tier of Mercedes-Benz Stadium was closed – but other tiers were far from full

Chelsea kicked off their Fifa Club World Cup campaign against Los Angeles FC to tens of thousands of empty seats in Atlanta.

The game started at 3pm local time on a working Monday at Mercedes-Benz Stadium.

The attendance forChelsea's 2-0 winwas announced as 22,137, in a ground which can hold 71,000 spectators – though the entire top tier was closed.

Chelsea boss Enzo Maresca, said: "I think the environment was a bit strange, the stadium was almost empty, not full.

"We are professional and we have to adapt to the situation, to the environment. You have to adapt when you play with a full stadium. You have to adapt when the stadium is not full but it doesn't matter."

Sources had told the BBC that Fifa was expecting a crowd of about 26,000.

A small middle tier seemed to be mostly full, but a larger bottom tier was more than half empty.

The cheapest ticket was about £37 immediately before kick-off, although seats were significantly more expensive in the build up. During the game tickets were still on sale online for £26 – with many available in nearly every section.

Los Angeles is more than 2,000 miles away from Atlanta, across the southern United States.

LAFC were late replacements for disqualified Leon in the tournament and their 150 ultras dominated the atmosphere – despite Chelsea having many more fans.

The Blues supporters mainly got animated for the goals, Liam Delap's introduction for his debut and booing major decisions.

The newly expanded Club World Cup is being treated as a dress rehearsal for the international World Cup next summer, which will be held in the USA, Canada and Mexico.

The CWC is just being played in the US.

All these seats were still on sale during the first half

Club World Cup: Chelsea face LAFC in front of tens of thousands of empty seats

One of the big talking points in recent weeks was whether people cared about Fifa's new-look competition.

Ticket sales have been slow, and this was the first match of the tournament to take place on a weekday.

There will be two or three games played during regular work hours on every other weekday this week and next week until the group stage ends on Thursday, 26 June (noon, 2pm and 3pm local time).

Chelsea also played at the stadium two years ago – and almost sold out with more than 70,000 fans watching them face Newcastle in a friendly tournament named the Premier League Summer Series.

The ground is home to the MLS's best-supported football team – Atlanta United, who average 44,037 fans per match, and also hosts the USA men's and women's national teams.

Before kick-off there were even fewer fans in

Thousands upon thousands of seats were empty in Atlanta

The question on everybody's lips is are these attendances just because fans do not really care about this revamped Club World Cup – or could this apathy continue into the actual World Cup in 2026?

BBC Sport spoke to two American journalists to get their thoughts.

Doug Roberson of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution thinks there were several factors, but "it's not because people here don't care about soccer".

"The people aren't here because it's Monday at 3pm," he said. "Frankly I am surprised there are as many as there are.

"It's a tournament that doesn't mean a lot to people in the US because it's new. I would imagine paying to come to a tournament you don't know didn't appeal, because the World Cup is coming next year and people are trying to save money for that.

"If I were Fifa, for the World Cup I would have game times where more people could come. It is something to think about – and the ticket prices were ridiculous."

Jonathan Tannenwald, chief soccer correspondent for the Philadelphia Inquirer, says Fifa's marketing is to blame.

"When you come here you have to do a lot of marketing," he said. "You can't just expect people to turn up.

"There was no true local organising committee in the US because Fifa were doing it all in-house.

"We will all show up for the World Cup next summer, but for the Club World Cup they needed to market it to explain.

"Will people show up in the knockout stages? Probably. Will they show up for Chelsea v LAFC in the group stage when tickets are too expensive and the game is in Atlanta? No. They are smarter than that. That is on Fifa."

BBC Sport chief football writer Phil McNulty said "the sight of almost 50,000 empty seats will come as an early embarrassment for Fifa".

"There have been long-held fears that this latest supposedly showpiece tournament, shoehorned into an already over-crowded calendar after a gruelling season, would struggle to capture the public imagination," he said.

"The sea of empty red seats as Chelsea beat Los Angeles FC provided grim confirmation.

"A kick-off at 3pm US time on a Monday may have been a contributory factor, while Chelsea and Los Angeles may also struggle to attract local interest, but the lack of supporters will surely have felt uncomfortable for Fifa's top brass, including maybe even its ultra-confident president Gianni Infantino.

"It is perhaps also an early warning for Fifa that ticket pricing should be realistic, and within reasonable reach, for games played in the United States at next summer's World Cup.

"Fifa's latest project is in its infancy, but this was a very bad look so early in the tournament that it has set so much store by."

LAFC manager Steve Cherundolo was asked about the crowd after the game.

"I think it is different each game you look at," he said.

"In the Rose Bowl in LA, there was a huge crowd for the game between PSG and Atletico Madrid. Maybe LA likes football more than Atlanta, I don't know, we should judge at the end."

Some reports pre-tournament claimed students at a Miami college, which is a partner of Fifa, were told if they bought one ticket for £14.70 they would get four free.

Tickets have been on sale under a dynamic pricing model, with prices determined by demand.

They are available for every game – with many on sale for £25 – although the crowd for Boca's Group C match against Benfica later in the day was a lot healthier, with more than 55,000 in the 65,000 capacity Hard Rock Stadium.

Most games still have thousands of tickets available. Real Madrid's opener against Al-Hilal at Miami's Hard Rock Stadium only has 200 tickets left officially – though thousands of resale ones are available.

Despite the issues there have still been some large attendances.

Fifa claims 60,927 watched the opener betweenInter Miami and Al-Ahly.

The official crowd for Paris St-Germain's4-0 winover Atletico Madrid was 80,619.

Other attendances so far have been 21,152, 30,151 and 46,275.

The United Kingdom was the country with the 11th-most tickets sold – with the US, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico and Canada leading the way.

Jon, Aberystwyth:If the Chelsea match is boring, entertain yourself by playing Spot The Fan.

Sam, Southanpton:What was wrong with the old Club World Cup format? Because the list of things wrong with this one could go on for miles.

Matty:So much negativity about this tournament. People not used to change. So proud of my Chelsea representing the Premier League on this stage.

Scott, Preston:I don't think it's the fact that people aren't used to change, I think it's clearly the motives behind this tournament? Obviously it's about money and no regards to players' welfare after a long season for all the clubs involved. I love football but to be honest it's on most nights of the week and it's only natural that people will switch off eventually.

Terry, Hammersmith:It's just not sustainable having elite players playing competitively every summer. For the very best in Europe, they will have Euros, Club World Cup, World Cup and then a year off. This will inevitably lead to an overall drop in quality at domestic level.

Listen to the latest Football Daily podcast

Get football news sent straight to your phone